Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 13.9.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicByteDance Seed
Noometry Index29.342.5
Released2024-02-292026-02-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—256K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked4620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Coding12641472
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Seed 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12461453
SimpleBench23.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
Thematic Generalization—57.1%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Math12731440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Expert12231440
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision10231275

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English12581442
LMArena Chinese12481490
LMArena French12741470
LMArena German12581443
LMArena Japanese12041408
LMArena Korean11871412
LMArena Russian12801450
LMArena Spanish12461460

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12481414
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query12591428

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text12621448
LMArena Creative Writing12351406
LMArena Multi-Turn12751441
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper