Model comparison

DBRX vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 87.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Side by side

DBRX and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
DBRXKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderDatabricksMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.443.3
Released2024-03-272026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1132—
ALE-Bench—886.23
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DBRX: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1113—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1145—
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond32.9%87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1076—

Multilingual Not comparable

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1071—
LMArena Chinese1068—
LMArena French1096—
LMArena German1057—
LMArena Japanese990—
LMArena Korean993—
LMArena Russian1078—
LMArena Spanish1064—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1112—

Long Context Not comparable

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1112—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1119—
LMArena Creative Writing1104—
LMArena Multi-Turn1111—

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper