Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Llama 2-13B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 30.0.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1062 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1051 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1086 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1046 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Llama 2-13B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Llama 2-13B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.