Model comparison
Command R vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 13.3.
Side by side
| Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1236 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1220 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1233 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.