Cohere, open weights
Command R
Command R by Cohere ranks 272nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 31.4. Its strongest category is knowledge, where it ranks 221st. API pricing starts at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens, with a 128K-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #272 of 354
- Index score
- 31.4
- Evidence
- Confirmed 29 results
- Provider
Cohere
- Released
- August 30, 2024
- Weights
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- No
- Context window
- 128K
- Max output
- 4K
- Input price
- $0.15 / M
- Output price
- $0.60 / M
- Blended price
- $0.26 / M
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- #53 of 219
- Knowledge cutoff
- June 2024
- Input
- text
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 29.3
- Reasoning 13.8
- Math 28.0
- Knowledge 31.0
- Multilingual 35.7
- Instruction Following 58.1
- Long Context 36.3
- Writing & Preference 38.2
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 29.3 | #306 | 4 |
| Reasoning | 13.8 | #331 | 5 |
| Math | 28.0 | #246 | 2 |
| Knowledge | 31.0 | #221 | 1 |
| Multilingual | 35.7 | #245 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 58.1 | #261 | 2 |
| Long Context | 36.3 | #231 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 38.2 | #254 | 4 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where Command R places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 31.0 | −6.3 | #221 of 314, top 71% |
| Math | 28.0 | −8.6 | #246 of 327, top 76% |
| Long Context | 36.3 | −4.6 | #231 of 296, top 79% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 13.8 | −9.8 | #331 of 350, top 95% |
| Coding | 29.3 | −9.4 | #306 of 340, top 90% |
| Instruction Following | 58.1 | −13.2 | #261 of 305, top 86% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below Command R. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | #268 | 31.8 | — | — | Compare |
| Mistral Small 3.1 | #269 | 31.7 | $0.40 | — | Compare |
| Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | #270 | 31.6 | — | — | Compare |
| o1-pro | #271 | 31.5 | $263 | — | Compare |
| Qwen1.5-7B | #273 | 31.4 | — | — | Compare |
| Wizardlm 13b | #274 | 31.4 | — | — | Compare |
| Qwen-14B | #275 | 31.4 | — | — | Compare |
| Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 | #276 | 31.3 | — | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | #42 of 64, top 66% | BigCodeBench | 2024-08-30 | |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | #37 of 39, top 95% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | #250 of 294, top 86% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Coding | 1128 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | #43 of 66, top 66% | BigCodeBench | 2024-08-30 |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | #36 of 39, top 93% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | #250 of 297, top 85% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| DTBench | 46.4% | #144 of 151, top 96% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | #37 of 39, top 95% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMCA | 9.2% | #114 of 125, top 92% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench | 27.5% | #36 of 39, top 93% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | #36 of 39, top 93% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Math | 1120 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Math | 1155 | #248 of 285, top 88% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | #242 of 273, top 89% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| MMLU | 65.2% | #55 of 81, top 68% | Epoch AI |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1144 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | #245 of 297, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | #239 of 285, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1146 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena French | 1162 | #202 of 223, top 91% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1128 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena German | 1176 | #197 of 231, top 86% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1094 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | #178 of 211, top 85% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1092 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | #174 of 213, top 82% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | #244 of 283, top 87% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | #204 of 226, top 91% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | #34 of 39, top 88% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | #248 of 298, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1125 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1158 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | #241 of 291, top 83% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1163 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Text | 1187 | #248 of 297, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1154 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | #245 of 295, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1147 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | #247 of 295, top 84% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | #35 of 39, top 90% | Epoch AI |
API pricing by provider
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cohere | $0.15 | $0.60 | — | 2026-10-10 |
| openrouter | $0.15 | $0.60 | — | 2026-10-10 |
Compare Command R
- Command R vs o1-pro
- Command R vs Qwen1.5-7B
- Command R vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
- Command R vs Wizardlm 13b
- Command R vs Mistral Small 3.1
- Command R vs Qwen-14B
- Command R vs GPT-6 Astra
- Command R vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Command R vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Command R vs Kimi K3
- Command R vs Grok 4.6
- Command R vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Command R vs GLM-5.3
- Command R vs Muse Spark 1.3
Other Cohere models
Frequently asked questions
How good is Command R?
Command R by Cohere ranks 272nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 31.4. Its strongest category is knowledge, where it ranks 221st. API pricing starts at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens, with a 128K-token context window.
How much does Command R cost?
Command R costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens on Cohere's own API.
What is Command R's context window?
Command R accepts up to 128K tokens of input and can write up to 4K tokens in one response.
Is Command R open source?
Yes. Command R's weights are downloadable; check the license for commercial terms.
What are Command R's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, Command R places best in knowledge, math, long context and lowest in reasoning, coding, instruction following.
What is Command R best at?
Its best category is knowledge, where it ranks 221st on Noometry.