Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 32.8 to 14.2.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderIBMAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.633.0
Released—2024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding11121235
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10921220

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math11431242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1087—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10371236
LMArena Chinese10631249
LMArena Russian10601246

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10881233

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query11221224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text10961256
LMArena Creative Writing10711231
LMArena Multi-Turn10631252

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper