Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 14.2.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.833.0
Released—2024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding10251235

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10471220

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math10721242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10631236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10601233

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query9981224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text10981256
LMArena Creative Writing10911231
LMArena Multi-Turn10581252

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper