Model comparison
Command R vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 22.0 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1149 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1138 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1159 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1131 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1099 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.