Model comparison

Command R+ vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 23.4 to 9.2.

Side by side

Command R+ and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Command R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index32.435.9
Released2024-08-302024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding11871209
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11861202
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11881216
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert11741171
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12161206
LMArena Chinese12261214
LMArena French12091197
LMArena German12161192
LMArena Japanese11661128
LMArena Korean11381148
LMArena Russian12271219
LMArena Spanish11891195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11971203
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12301225

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text12291225
LMArena Creative Writing12351203
LMArena Multi-Turn12131214
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper