Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #222 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 23.5 to 9.2.

Side by side

Command R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index32.435.9
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Coding11871223
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11861203
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Math11881230
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Expert11741167
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Command R+ leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12161181
LMArena Chinese12261180
LMArena Russian12271187
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11971201
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12301205

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Text12291228
LMArena Creative Writing12351213
LMArena Multi-Turn12131227
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper