Model comparison
Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads 22.8 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 35.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1183 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1174 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1195 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1174 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1154 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.