Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 5 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 35.5.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
gpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index32.535.9
Released2025-08-052024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13061209
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12741202
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13171216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert12581171
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12681206
LMArena Chinese13141214
LMArena German12551192
LMArena Japanese12441128
LMArena Korean12361148
LMArena Russian12781219
LMArena Spanish12671195
LMArena French—1197

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12361203
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12501225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text12871225
LMArena Creative Writing12011203
LMArena Multi-Turn12681214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper