Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.9 to 35.7.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.835.3
Released—2024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding11861209

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11461202

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11521216

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert11421171

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10991206
LMArena Chinese11451214
LMArena Russian10921219
LMArena French—1196
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11311203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11621225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11501225
LMArena Creative Writing11291203
LMArena Multi-Turn11081214

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.9 vs 34.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper