Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 37.3 to 28.5.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 39.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.