Model comparison
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 37.3 to 14.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 5.1% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.32 for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.32 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 43 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#284), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 26% | — |
| WeirdML | 14.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.6 (#100), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | — |
| BALROG | 23% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 13.7 (#325), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.32 | 144.62 |
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 59.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 50.2% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.3 (#292), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1268 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.5 (#220), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 22.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | — |
| MMLU | 86.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 40.1 (#215), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena French | 1280 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.3 (#152), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#290), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.8 (#203), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1279 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct lists at $0.10 and $0.32.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.