Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Yi-1.5-34B

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Flash and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Qwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index39.530.2
Released2026-07-152024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.03—
Output $ / M tokens$0.13—
Results tracked721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
LMArena Coding—1169
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
NYT Connections (extended)43.8%—
Chess Puzzles23%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1160
Mystery Game Puzzles15%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.62—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)19.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
LMArena Math—1182
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond82.3%32%
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English—1121
LMArena Chinese—1213
LMArena French—1155
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Russian—1091
LMArena Spanish—1120

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1139

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text—1173
LMArena Creative Writing—1135
LMArena Multi-Turn—1153

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Yi-1.5-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper