Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index30.840.2
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding10461461
LMArena WebDev—1264
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10321436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.35

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math10561431

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert—1432

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English10111404
LMArena Chinese9761442
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1451
LMArena Korean—1385
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1409

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following10281415

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query10131415

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text10661421
LMArena Creative Writing10321374
LMArena Multi-Turn10151423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper