Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Grok 3

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 3 leads 55.8 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 3 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGrok 3
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index30.839.9
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1440

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Coding10461432
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10321434
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.33

Math Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Math10561391
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Non-English10111410
LMArena Chinese9761448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Instruction Following10281409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Longer Query10131439
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Text10661426
LMArena Creative Writing10321414
LMArena Multi-Turn10151425
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper