Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Laguna M.1
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1397 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | — |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 85% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Laguna M.1?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.