Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)
Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 2 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 31.6 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.9% for Claude Opus 4.1 and 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2024-02-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.3 (#69), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 45.9% | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1294 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.5% |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 34.8 (#38), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 42% | 7.5% |
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| BALROG | — | 21% |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 31.6 (#70), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 60% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 80% | 59% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.11 | 131.73 |
| ForecastBench | 62 | 58.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 22.0 (#267), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | 23.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1315 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 41.9 (#93), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | 57.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | 4.6% |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | 13.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1279 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |
| MMLU | — | 86.9% |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 26.2 (#114), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
| VPCT | 35% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 52.1 (#90), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | 1301 |
| LMArena German | 1412 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1381 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1421 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1310 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 75.8 (#53), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1297 |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#60), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 62.6 (#70), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1296 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.