Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.8

Rank #168 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 10.0.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index28.838.8
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12231346
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11971322
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12131305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert11731307
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12051275
LMArena Chinese11881304
LMArena French12281328
LMArena German12041283
LMArena Korean11281206
LMArena Russian12271268
LMArena Spanish12041337
LMArena Japanese1131—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12001298

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12111312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12181311
LMArena Creative Writing11861264
LMArena Multi-Turn12271309

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper