Noometry

Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

39.4

Rank #168 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 31.1.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index39.429.3
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding13471101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13221100
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math13051151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert13081067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12751058
LMArena Chinese13041061
LMArena French13281135
LMArena German12821080
LMArena Korean1206894
LMArena Russian12681111
LMArena Spanish13361111
LMArena Japanese—966

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12991087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13121088

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text13111110
LMArena Creative Writing12641083
LMArena Multi-Turn13091068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper