Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

39.4

Rank #168 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.3 to 14.7.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.239.4
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12861347
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12511322
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12441305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert12081308
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12381275
LMArena Chinese12291304
LMArena French12641328
LMArena German12371282
LMArena Korean11731206
LMArena Russian12531268
LMArena Spanish12611336
LMArena Japanese1175—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12411299
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12611312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12551311
LMArena Creative Writing12331264
LMArena Multi-Turn12651309
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper