Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 36.2 to 10.7.
  • GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Claude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index29.038.9
Released2024-02-292025-07-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked3027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Coding12231397
GSO—2.9%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Hard Prompts11971379
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43%
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
ForecastBench—59.2
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Math12131396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
Omni-MATH—39.1%
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Expert11731370
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), GLM-4.5-Air: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English12051366
LMArena Chinese11891426
LMArena French12291399
LMArena German12041377
LMArena Japanese11311348
LMArena Korean11281308
LMArena Russian12271373
LMArena Spanish12041386

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following11991354
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query12111366

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text12181384
LMArena Creative Writing11861343
LMArena Multi-Turn12271371
WildBench—78.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and GLM-4.5-Air share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper