Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 9.9.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.