Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Molmo 2 8b

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Anthropic

34.4

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 3 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Molmo 2 8b leads 29.5 to 26.0.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Claude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.438.7
Released2024-06-20—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked605

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
Aider Polyglot51.6%—
GSO4.6%—
WeirdML40%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.8%—
LiveBench Coding67.1%—
LMArena Coding1343—
BigCodeBench Complete58.6%—
CadEval48%—
HumanEval+81.7%—
MBPP+74.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
TheAgentCompany24%—
Cybench17.5%—
BALROG32.6%—
METR Time Horizons45.2%—

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176), Molmo 2 8b: 24.5 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts13051288
SimpleBench41.4%—
EnigmaEval0.9%—
LiveBench Reasoning56.7%—
DTBench67.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.55—
ForecastBench60.7—
LiveBench59%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%—
Omni-MATH27.6%—
LiveBench Math52.3%—
LMArena Math1306—
MATH Level 556.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond55.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.1%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Confabulations19.9%—
GPQA (HELM)56.5%—
LMArena Expert1264—
MMLU87.3%—

Multimodal Molmo 2 8b leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115), Molmo 2 8b: 29.5 (#106)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision11251081
Video-MME60%—
GeoBench62%—
VPCT33%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180), Molmo 2 8b: 42.8 (#186)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English12831275
LMArena Chinese1271—
LMArena French1304—
LMArena German1297—
LMArena Japanese1234—
LMArena Korean1200—
LMArena Russian1305—
LMArena Spanish1289—

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177), Molmo 2 8b: 67.2 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following12971270
LiveBench Instruction Following69.3%—
IFEval85.5%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1311—

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159), Molmo 2 8b: 49.5 (#187)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Text12981288
LMArena Creative Writing1292—
Short-Story Creative Writing80.3%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1451—
WildBench79.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1326—
LiveBench Language53.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Molmo 2 8b?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper