Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

24.9

Rank #340 Reported

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 52.8 to 15.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Claude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index24.949.9
Released2023-11-212026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench51%94.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.22154.32
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1477

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond33%—
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
LMArena Expert—1480
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English—1471
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1457

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text—1479
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LMArena Multi-Turn—1484

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper