Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 15.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 88.9% for Muse Spark.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark specifications
Claude 2.1Muse Spark
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.250.6
Released2023-11-212026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1481

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27152.04
CritPt—11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
DTBench51%—
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Muse Spark leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
GPQA Diamond33%89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper