Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderDatabricksMeta
Noometry Index25.549.9
Released2023-04-112026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding7761498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts8041486
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67154.21
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math8711483
ProofBench—39%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
LMArena Expert—1478
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English8361472
LMArena Chinese8361518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1483
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following8141457

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text8511479
LMArena Creative Writing8641437
LMArena Multi-Turn7401485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper