Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 54.1 to 15.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 7.1% for Claude 2.1 and 60.3% for Muse Spark 1.2.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Claude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.250.3
Released2023-11-212026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked731

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
WeirdML7.1%60.3%
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
LMArena Coding—1495

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench51%94.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27154.87
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
LMCA—48.4%
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math—1471

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond33%—
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1480
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1478
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1461

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1482
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1494

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper