Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 36.1 to 9.6.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1417 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1395 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Muse Glimmer share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.