Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Granite 4.2 30b
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 38.5 to 15.5.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1394 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1375 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1405 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1342 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1346 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1359 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1294 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Granite 4.2 30b?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Granite 4.2 30b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.