Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1455 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1437 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1249 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1512 |
| LMArena French | — | 1467 |
| LMArena German | — | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1413 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.