Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 7.0.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Muse Glimmer share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.