Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1395 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1419 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Muse Glimmer share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.