Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.