Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3-8B

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-8B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 6.1% for Llama 3-8B.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-8B specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index39.125.5
Released2025-02-052024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1152
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06116.45
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1133
DTBench—43.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
LiveBench65.1%—
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
MATH Level 583.5%6.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1151

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond65.7%26.1%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1113
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English—1098
LMArena Chinese—1076
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Russian—1109
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1127

Long Context Llama 3-8B leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1128

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text—1166
LMArena Creative Writing—1150
LMArena Multi-Turn—1152
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-8B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper