Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.