Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 135.06 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.