Model comparison
QwQ-32B vs Yi-34B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where QwQ-32B leads 37.2 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.3% for QwQ-32B and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
Side by side
| QwQ-32B | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2024-11-28 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1112 |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1325 | 1104 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | 117.39 |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |
Math QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1114 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1324 | 1061 |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1305 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1279 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1070 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1091 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1094 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1113 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is QwQ-32B better than Yi-34B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is QwQ-32B or Yi-34B better for coding?
QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Yi-34B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.