Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Yi-34B

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-34B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 88.7% for Grok 3 and 5.1% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Yi-34B specifications
Grok 3Yi-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index39.927.8
Released2025-04-092023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Coding14321112
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14341104
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33117.39
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Math13911114
MATH Level 588.7%5.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond75.8%14.7%
LMArena Expert14211061
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14101079
LMArena Chinese14481176
LMArena French14601081
LMArena German14311042
LMArena Japanese1387993
LMArena Korean1373959
LMArena Russian14161050
LMArena Spanish14171070

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14091091
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14391094
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-34B
LMArena Text14261129
LMArena Creative Writing14141108
LMArena Multi-Turn14251113
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Yi-34B?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Yi-34B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper