Alibaba (Qwen), open weights
QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B by Alibaba (Qwen) ranks 159th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.8. Its strongest category is long context, where it ranks 11th.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #159 of 354
- Index score
- 39.8
- Evidence
- Confirmed 36 results
- Provider
Alibaba (Qwen)
- Released
- November 28, 2024
- Weights
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- Unknown
- Context window
- —
- Max output
- —
- Input price
- Not listed
- Output price
- Not listed
- Blended price
- Not listed
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- Not ranked
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 35.4
- Reasoning 23.7
- Math 38.0
- Knowledge 37.2
- Multilingual 44.8
- Instruction Following 72.6
- Long Context 49.0
- Writing & Preference 50.6
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 35.4 | #226 | 5 |
| Reasoning | 23.7 | #174 | 4 |
| Math | 38.0 | #143 | 3 |
| Knowledge | 37.2 | #158 | 3 |
| Multilingual | 44.8 | #176 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 72.6 | #137 | 2 |
| Long Context | 49.0 | #11 | 2 |
| Writing & Preference | 50.6 | #180 | 6 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where QwQ-32B places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Context | 49.0 | +8.0 | #11 of 296, top 4% |
| Math | 38.0 | +1.4 | #143 of 327, top 44% |
| Instruction Following | 72.6 | +1.3 | #137 of 305, top 45% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 35.4 | −3.4 | #226 of 340, top 67% |
| Multilingual | 44.8 | −2.6 | #176 of 297, top 60% |
| Writing & Preference | 50.6 | −3.1 | #180 of 312, top 58% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below QwQ-32B. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | #155 | 40.0 | $0.0875 | — | Compare |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | #156 | 39.9 | $0.055 | — | Compare |
| Grok 3 | #157 | 39.9 | — | 42 | Compare |
| GLM-4.5V | #158 | 39.8 | $0.90 | 34 | Compare |
| Step 1o Turbo 202506 | #160 | 39.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Nova 2 Lite | #161 | 39.7 | $0.85 | — | Compare |
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | #162 | 39.7 | $0.85 | — | Compare |
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | #163 | 39.6 | — | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | #35 of 44, top 80% | Epoch AI | ||
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | #22 of 64, top 35% | BigCodeBench | 2024-11-28 | |
| LiveBench Coding | 37.2% | Epoch AI | |||
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | #6 of 39, top 16% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | #178 of 294, top 61% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | #22 of 66, top 34% | BigCodeBench | 2024-11-28 |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | #96 of 129, top 75% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | #6 of 39, top 16% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Reasoning | 57.7% | Epoch AI | |||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1325 | #177 of 297, top 60% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1163 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 31.6% | Epoch AI | |||
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | #11 of 39, top 29% | Epoch AI | ||
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | #117 of 213, top 55% | Epoch AI | 2025-03-05 | |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | #50 of 72, top 70% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench | 40.3% | Epoch AI | |||
| LiveBench | 72% | #6 of 39, top 16% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | #103 of 173, top 60% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| LiveBench Math | 58.3% | Epoch AI | |||
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | #6 of 39, top 16% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Math | 1213 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Math | 1359 | #157 of 285, top 56% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | #108 of 186, top 59% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| Confabulations (lower is better) | 15.6% | #19 of 51, top 38% | Lech Mazur benchmarks | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1135 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1324 | #167 of 273, top 62% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1130 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Non-English | 1305 | #176 of 297, top 60% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1218 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | #153 of 285, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena French | 1336 | #148 of 223, top 67% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1313 | #146 of 231, top 64% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | #137 of 211, top 65% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1279 | #139 of 213, top 66% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | #178 of 283, top 63% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1115 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | #142 of 226, top 63% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | #6 of 39, top 16% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 35.6% | Epoch AI | |||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1156 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | #183 of 298, top 62% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | #11 of 47, top 24% | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | #182 of 291, top 63% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1167 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | #174 of 297, top 59% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Text | 1162 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | #178 of 295, top 61% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1134 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | #15 of 39, top 39% | Epoch AI | ||
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | #83 of 115, top 73% | EQ-Bench | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1141 | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | #180 of 295, top 62% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | #8 of 39, top 21% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Language | 21.1% | Epoch AI |
Compare QwQ-32B
- QwQ-32B vs GLM-4.5V
- QwQ-32B vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
- QwQ-32B vs Grok 3
- QwQ-32B vs Nova 2 Lite
- QwQ-32B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- QwQ-32B vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
- QwQ-32B vs GPT-6 Astra
- QwQ-32B vs Claude Fable 5.1
- QwQ-32B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- QwQ-32B vs Kimi K3
- QwQ-32B vs Grok 4.6
- QwQ-32B vs GLM-5.3
- QwQ-32B vs Muse Spark 1.3
- QwQ-32B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Other Alibaba (Qwen) models
- Qwen3.8 Max56.8
- Qwen3.7 Max51.5
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview51.5
- Qwen3.6 Plus47.5
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B46.0
- Qwen3.8 27B46.0
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview45.3
- Qwen3.7 Plus45.3
Frequently asked questions
How good is QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B by Alibaba (Qwen) ranks 159th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.8. Its strongest category is long context, where it ranks 11th.
Is QwQ-32B open source?
Yes. QwQ-32B's weights are downloadable; check the license for commercial terms.
What are QwQ-32B's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, QwQ-32B places best in long context, math, instruction following and lowest in coding, multilingual, writing & preference.
What is QwQ-32B best at?
Its best category is long context, where it ranks 11th on Noometry.