Model comparison
QwQ-32B vs Yi-1.5-34B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where QwQ-32B leads 37.2 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.3% for QwQ-32B and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
Side by side
| QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2024-11-28 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | 43.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1160 |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |
Math QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1182 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | 1323 | 1144 |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1306 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1337 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1263 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1278 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1120 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1144 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1153 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is QwQ-32B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is QwQ-32B or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.