Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 88.7% for Grok 3 and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Grok 3Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index39.930.6
Released2025-04-092024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4021

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14321169
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14341160
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13911182
MATH Level 588.7%25.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond75.8%32%
LMArena Expert14211144
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14101121
LMArena Chinese14481213
LMArena French14601156
LMArena German14311111
LMArena Japanese13871021
LMArena Korean13731005
LMArena Russian14161091
LMArena Spanish14171121

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14091139
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14391143
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14261173
LMArena Creative Writing14141135
LMArena Multi-Turn14251153
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper