Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 22.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 4% for Qwen3 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Max specifications
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.943.7
Released2026-07-152025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.03$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$0.13$6
Results tracked733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding—1456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
NYT Connections (extended)43.8%30.1%
Chess Puzzles23%4%
Mystery Game Puzzles15%5%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.64142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%

Math Too close to call

Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)19.3%18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%73.3%
LMArena Math—1446
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Too close to call

Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond82.3%72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English—1429
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1419

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1438

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Text—1439
LMArena Creative Writing—1402
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper