Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.7 Flash
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 40.5.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.