Model comparison
MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 9.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 48.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 65.1% for MiniMax-M3 and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 512K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 41 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 14.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | — |
| SciCode | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 640.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.7% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,158 | — |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.1% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 8% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.95 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 45.8% | — |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| DTBench | 78.9% | — |
| LMCA | 33.7% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| ProofBench | 18% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1435 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M3 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 9.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.