Model comparison
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct vs QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $8.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 5% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1325 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1324 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1107 | — |
| Video-MME | 73.5% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1297 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct better than QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and QwQ-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.