Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Grok 3 leads 30.5 to 18.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 61.3% for Grok 3 and 36% for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
  • Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
Grok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.929.9
Released2025-04-092024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked406

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
LMArena Coding1432—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%36%
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1434—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Not comparable

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LMArena Math1391—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1421—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 3: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1410—
LMArena Chinese1448—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Russian1416—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
IFEval88.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1426—
LMArena Creative Writing1414—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1425—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper