Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1035 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1018 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1048 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.